A collective mission.
Your contribution matters.
Help people find support, strengthen the public record and keep university accountability in view. You choose the part that fits your circumstances.
Not everyone can give money.
Everyone can help the mission.
A story can reveal a question that was never asked. A well-sourced correction can make the record more accurate. Sharing responsible reporting can help someone find a way to be heard. Financial support, arranged through private email follow-up, can help with qualified legal support and the costs of keeping this work available.
You do not need to donate to be heard. Support never buys a publication or a moderation decision. This site is currently private: a copied link does not grant access.
More hands.
More careful work.
We already work collaboratively with people who care about safer university communities, and we are always looking for more help. The mission belongs to the collective, not to a founder’s public profile.
Useful contributions include finding public records, checking sources, translating material, improving accessibility, offering qualified legal expertise and suggesting how people can be better supported. You do not need to share your own experience to contribute.
Offers of help go through a private contact ticket. Work involving private submissions requires a separate, authorized role and appropriate access; volunteering or donating does not give access to other people’s stories. Contributor identities stay private. Professional partnerships are disclosed only when confirmed and with permission.
People decide.
Evidence stays in view.
Our archive does not depend on Meta’s platforms, engagement targets or automated feed rules. We will not remove responsibly sourced reporting merely because it is uncomfortable, unpopular or critical of a powerful institution.
No AI model decides which reader posts are approved, edited or removed here. Community publication requires a human member of the collective to review consent, context, privacy and attribution, then explicitly approve the edited text. Technical checks protect the service; they do not replace that judgment.
Preserving the record means keeping sources, dates, relevant replies and visible corrections. It does not mean exposing private identities or leaving threats, unsupported accusations or withdrawn accounts online. When an account cannot be published, a reviewer can leave a reason through the private receipt portal. Changes and corrections should be explained where it is safe to do so.